Guest | Login | New User

  • Psychology 2.0

Method

HowTo.Method History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup

October 09, 2008, at 10:32 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed line 1 from:

(:redirect [[HowTo.Method-old]]:)

to:

(:redirect [[HowTo.Concept]]:)

September 17, 2008, at 11:55 AM EST by Zsomb -
Changed lines 3-4 from:
  • the concept is simple: a member posts an article on the Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it parts and the whole is TRUE or FALSE.
  • before the voting begins there is room for discussion, refining or editing the statement, placing arguments for and against, commenting &c.
to:
  • the concept is simple: a member posts an article on the Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it in whole or part is TRUE or FALSE.
  • before the voting begins there is room for discussion, refining or editing the statement, placing arguments for or against, commenting &c.
Changed line 6 from:
  • the article should be clear and not longer than it is necessary
to:
  • the article should be clear and not longer than is necessary
September 16, 2008, at 11:00 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed line 1 from:

Understanding the Concept

to:

The new methodology in brief

September 16, 2008, at 10:46 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed line 6 from:
  • the article should be clear and not longer than is required
to:
  • the article should be clear and not longer than it is necessary
September 16, 2008, at 10:46 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed line 3 from:
  • the concept is simple: a member posts an article on the Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it parts and the whole is TRUE or FALSE.
to:
  • the concept is simple: a member posts an article on the Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it parts and the whole is TRUE or FALSE.
September 16, 2008, at 10:45 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed line 3 from:
  • the concept is simple: a member posts a Statement on the Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it is TRUE or FALSE.
to:
  • the concept is simple: a member posts an article on the Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it parts and the whole is TRUE or FALSE.
Changed line 6 from:
  • the statement should be clear and not longer than is required
to:
  • the article should be clear and not longer than is required
September 11, 2008, at 09:53 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed line 3 from:
  • the concept is simple: a member posts a Statement on the Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it is TRUE or FALSE.
to:
  • the concept is simple: a member posts a Statement on the Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it is TRUE or FALSE.
Changed line 5 from:
to:
September 11, 2008, at 09:52 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed line 5 from:
to:
June 30, 2008, at 02:37 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed lines 3-4 from:
  • the concept is simple: somebody posts a Statement on Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it is TRUE or NOT.
  • before the voting starts there is room for discussion, refining/editing the statement, placing pro and contra arguments, commenting etc.
to:
  • the concept is simple: a member posts a Statement on the Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it is TRUE or FALSE.
  • before the voting begins there is room for discussion, refining or editing the statement, placing arguments for and against, commenting &c.
Changed line 6 from:
  • the statement should be clear and not longer than absolutely needed
to:
  • the statement should be clear and not longer than is required
August 12, 2007, at 03:44 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed line 3 from:
  • the concept is simple: somebody posts a statement on Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it is TRUE or NOT.
to:
  • the concept is simple: somebody posts a Statement on Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it is TRUE or NOT.
August 12, 2007, at 08:45 AM EST by fodormik -
Changed lines 5-8 from:
  • the statement
    • should not be too complicated
    • has not got to be defined by tricky psychological sceintific terms: if the terms help to be more clear, please use it, but please do not prefer the language of science against the everyday commincation just to appear more professional
to:
  • a simple language should be used
  • the statement should be clear and not longer than absolutely needed
August 12, 2007, at 08:23 AM EST by fodormik -
Added lines 1-8:

Understanding the Concept

  • the concept is simple: somebody posts a statement on Psychology 2.0 site and the community decides whether it is TRUE or NOT.
  • before the voting starts there is room for discussion, refining/editing the statement, placing pro and contra arguments, commenting etc.
  • the statement
    • should not be too complicated
    • has not got to be defined by tricky psychological sceintific terms: if the terms help to be more clear, please use it, but please do not prefer the language of science against the everyday commincation just to appear more professional