Psychology 2.0's key concept is voting, as:

• voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource-consuming experiment

• the voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work
• the usage of the voting: insert into an article the following markup

(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worthy to try' :)

(:markup class="horiz":) (:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying' :) (:markupend:)

(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying':)

• the usage of the voting: insert in an article the following markup

(:markup class="horiz":) (:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying':) (:markupend:) where

• id – This is a serial number of the voting modules present in the page starting from 1 and up to an unlimited number.
• ask – This is the survey question to be asked. It should be enclosed with single quotes.
• option1 – This is the first survey response. It should be enclosed in single quotes
• option2– This is the second survey response. It should be enclosed in single quotes.
• option3 – This is the third survey response. It should be enclosed in single quotes. The third survey response is optional.

• voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource consuming experiment
• when voting, not everybody is equal: based on seniority and professional background people can have different voting weights
• the voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work

Psychology 2.0's key concept is the voting

• Voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource consuming experiment
• When voting, not everybody is equal: based on seniority and professional background people can have different voting weights
• The voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work