- Psychology 2.0
Postmodern
HowTo.Postmodern History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup
(:vote id=1 ask='Postmodern science can speed up research in psychology' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='Science and postmodern do not fit' :)
(:vote id=1 ask='Postmodern science can speed up research in psychology' option1='TRUE' option2='FALSE' option3='Science and postmodern do not fit' :)
(:vote id=1 ask='Postmodern science is a good option in psychology?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='Science and postmodern do not fit' :)
(:vote id=1 ask='Postmodern science can speed up research in psychology' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='Science and postmodern do not fit' :)
- vote
(:vote id=1 ask='Postmodern science is a good option in psychology?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='Science and postmodern do not fit' :)
If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life?
By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority.
Is this not a valueless compromise?
No, due to two reasons:
"If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life?"
"By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority."
"Is this not a valueless compromise?"
"No, due to two reasons:
- there is a special wisdom in the majority that has a sense of value, even if, at the moment, that is not understood by contemporary philosophers
- there is a special wisdom in the majority that has a sense of value, even if, at the moment, that is not understood by contemporary philosophers"
- If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life?
- By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority.
-Is this not a valueless compromise?
-No, due to two reasons:
If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life?
By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority.
Is this not a valueless compromise?
No, due to two reasons:
Postmodern is a philosophy which realized that universal values does not exist
What may be holy for me is to others from another culture an oddity or funny. What I treat as taboo may be a commonplace, everyday thing for someone else.
-If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life?
-By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority.
Postmodern is a philosophy which realizes that universal values do not exist
What is holy for me may be to others from another culture odd or strange. What I treat as taboo may be a commonplace, everyday thing for someone else.
- If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life?
- By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority.
-No, because of two reasons:
- after a while the opinion of the majority will become the leading opinion anyhow
- there is a special wisdom in the majority that has a sense of worthy things even if, at the moment, that is not understood by contemporary philosophers
The above mentioned logics is used mainly in the arts.
-No, due to two reasons:
- after a while, the opinion of the majority will have become the leading opinion
- there is a special wisdom in the majority that has a sense of value, even if, at the moment, that is not understood by contemporary philosophers
The above mentioned logic is used mainly in the arts.
Karl Popper found out that as there does not a completely true statement upon which we can build on, so nothing can be proved. That things can be negated, proved to be false. So, the method suggested by him, and accepted by all sciences, is the following: concerning an issue, consider all available theories and try to negate them. The one that can not be proven to be false will be taken as true, until somebody can negate it.
Karl Popper found out that as there is no completely true statement upon which we can build on, so nothing can be proved. That things can be negated, proved to be false. The method suggested by him, and accepted by all science, is the following: concerning an issue, consider all available theories and try to negate them. The one that can not be proven to be false will be taken as true, until somebody can negate it.
As in the case of taking steps to reach a theory, one must investigate all available theories and prove them false, so the progress of the science is slow. Psychology as a science investigates ourselves (human beings). That is why all men and women, all schools, clubs, groups &c. can be seen as separate research laboratories. The results from these laboratories are contained within each mind. By placing these together we obtain experimental research on more persons than ever before. The abovementioned special wisdom of the majority might be shown by such work to be proven.
We are not aiming for 100% postmodern science!
As in taking steps to reach a theory, one must investigate all available theories and prove them false, so the progress of the science is slow. Psychology as a science investigates human beings. That is why all men and women, schools, clubs, groups &c. can be seen as separate research laboratories. The results from these laboratories are contained within each mind. By placing these together, we obtain experimental research on more people than ever before. The abovementioned special wisdom of the majority might be proven by such work.
We are not aiming for 100% post-modern science!
-If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life?
-By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority.
-Is this not a valueless compromise?
-No, because of two reasons:
- after a while the opinion of the majority will become the leading opinion
-If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life?
-By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority.
-Is this not a valueless compromise?
-No, because of two reasons:
- after a while the opinion of the majority will become the leading opinion anyhow
If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life?
By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority. Is this not a valueless compromise?
No, because of two reasons:
-If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life?
-By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority.
-Is this not a valueless compromise?
-No, because of two reasons:
Karl Popper found out that as there does not a completely true statement upon which we can build on, so nothing can be proven. That things can be negated, proven to be false. So, the method suggested by him, and accepted by all sciences, is the following: concerning an issue, consider all available theories and try to negate them. The one that can not be proven to be false will be taken as true, until somebody can negate it.
Karl Popper found out that as there does not a completely true statement upon which we can build on, so nothing can be proved. That things can be negated, proved to be false. So, the method suggested by him, and accepted by all sciences, is the following: concerning an issue, consider all available theories and try to negate them. The one that can not be proven to be false will be taken as true, until somebody can negate it.
What may be holy for me is to others from another culture an oddity or funny. What I treat as taboomay be a commonplace, everyday thing for someone else.
-If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life? -By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority. Is this not a valueless compromise? -No, because of two reasons:
What may be holy for me is to others from another culture an oddity or funny. What I treat as taboo may be a commonplace, everyday thing for someone else.
If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life? By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority. Is this not a valueless compromise? No, because of two reasons:
Postmodern is a philosophy that realised that universal values does not exist
What is a holy thing for me, it is a funny stuff for people from other culture. What I treat as a taboo it is common everyday thing for somebody else.
-If this is the situation, how can we find our ways in life? -By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority. -Is this not a valueless compomise? -No, because of two reasons:
The above mentioned logics was used mainly on arts.
Postmodern is a philosophy which realized that universal values does not exist
What may be holy for me is to others from another culture an oddity or funny. What I treat as taboomay be a commonplace, everyday thing for someone else.
-If that is the situation, how can we find our way in life? -By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority. Is this not a valueless compromise? -No, because of two reasons:
- after a while the opinion of the majority will become the leading opinion
- there is a special wisdom in the majority that has a sense of worthy things even if, at the moment, that is not understood by contemporary philosophers
The above mentioned logics is used mainly in the arts.
Karl Popper found out that as there doesn't exist a 100% true statement on what we could build on, nothing can be proven. Just things can be negated (proven that they are false). So, the method suggested by him and fully accepted by all sciences is the following: about an issue, consider all available theories and try to negate them. The one which can not be proven that is false, will be handled as true, until somebody can not negate it.
Karl Popper found out that as there does not a completely true statement upon which we can build on, so nothing can be proven. That things can be negated, proven to be false. So, the method suggested by him, and accepted by all sciences, is the following: concerning an issue, consider all available theories and try to negate them. The one that can not be proven to be false will be taken as true, until somebody can negate it.
As in the case of all steps to reach a theory you have to investigate all available thoeries and prove their false-ness, the progress of the science is rather slow. Psychology is a science investigating ourselves (the human beings). That is why all men and women, all schools, clubs, groups etc. can be seen as a separate research lab. The results of these labs are in eachones mind. If we put it together we will have researches with more experimental persons than ever. The above mentioned special wisdom of the majority might work excellent.
As in the case of taking steps to reach a theory, one must investigate all available theories and prove them false, so the progress of the science is slow. Psychology as a science investigates ourselves (human beings). That is why all men and women, all schools, clubs, groups &c. can be seen as separate research laboratories. The results from these laboratories are contained within each mind. By placing these together we obtain experimental research on more persons than ever before. The abovementioned special wisdom of the majority might be shown by such work to be proven.
Some decision-making procedures can lead to mistakes. That is why experts and experiments should have the same weight as the mass. The experts' opinion, the output of a crucial experiment in a debate is VERY IMPORTANT in this methodology.
Some decision-making procedures can lead to mistakes. That is why experts and experiments should have the same weight as the mass. Notwithstanding expert opinion, the output of a crucial experiment undertaken via debate is IMPORTANT to this methodology.
(:toc:)
Postmodern is a philosophy that realised that universal values does not exist
Postmodern is a philosophy that realised that universal values does not exist
What about science?
What about science?
Is there any alternative?
Is there any alternative?
l
l
(:drawing popper:)
(:drawing popper:)
(:drawing progress:)
(:drawing progress:)
(:drawing popper:)
(:drawing popper:)
(:drawing progress:)
(:drawing progress:)
(:drawing popper:)
(:drawing popper:)
Karl Popper found out that as everything was built as nothing can be proven
Karl Popper found out that as there doesn't exist a 100% true statement on what we could build on, nothing can be proven. Just things can be negated (proven that they are false). So, the method suggested by him and fully accepted by all sciences is the following: about an issue, consider all available theories and try to negate them. The one which can not be proven that is false, will be handled as true, until somebody can not negate it.
(:drawing popper:)
Is there any alternative?
(:drawing progress:)
As in the case of all steps to reach a theory you have to investigate all available thoeries and prove their false-ness, the progress of the science is rather slow. Psychology is a science investigating ourselves (the human beings). That is why all men and women, all schools, clubs, groups etc. can be seen as a separate research lab. The results of these labs are in eachones mind. If we put it together we will have researches with more experimental persons than ever. The above mentioned special wisdom of the majority might work excellent.
We are not aiming for 100% postmodern science!
Some decision-making procedures can lead to mistakes. That is why experts and experiments should have the same weight as the mass. The experts' opinion, the output of a crucial experiment in a debate is VERY IMPORTANT in this methodology.
Postmodern Science
Postmodern is a philosophy that realised that universal values does not exist
What is a holy thing for me, it is a funny stuff for people from other culture. What I treat as a taboo it is common everyday thing for somebody else.
-If this is the situation, how can we find our ways in life? -By taking into consideration the opinion of the majority. -Is this not a valueless compomise? -No, because of two reasons:
The above mentioned logics was used mainly on arts.
What about science?
Karl Popper found out that as everything was built as nothing can be proven
